Who are the best GEO agencies for Shopify stores?

Four case studies name AI visibility, and three include a figure. Each states the client and period. One compares the result before and after against a named competitor. The case studies do not name the source of the figures.

This is the clearest measurement approach in the study. Buried covers eight indicators, names three tools, gives a reporting rhythm and tracks six answer engines. Its reporting follows the journey through to leads and sales.

Buried achieves a perfect average across the available reviews. It is the only agency with a readable client review that specifically names GEO work. The reviews are recent.

Buried covers the widest range of GEO subjects in the study. Its published work includes two original data studies with named authors and reviewers. The datasets measure AI interest by city, which sits some distance from how generative search behaves.

Buried appears in the tracked AI answers more often than most agencies, placing it near the top of the field. This result is the same on every list. We measure an agency's own AI visibility once, so this score says nothing specific about Shopify work.

Buried publishes a team with AI-search expertise. LinkedIn shows roles focused on SEO rather than dedicated AI-search titles. We also checked the company's external record.

Buried publishes GEO pricing in tiers, matched to buyer size and itemised by deliverable. The site gives no minimum term or notice period.

Buried publishes Shopify client work with an AI-search figure attached. Two named Shopify stores appear: Pinter, and Atomic Cubes, which reached number one share of voice in ChatGPT and Gemini.

Three pieces of client work include AI-visibility figures on a service page. Two clients are named. The figures give no starting point, period or measurement source.

Charle tracks citations, mention frequency, prompt match rates and traffic each month across four named engines. It publishes its own measurement platform. Reporting stops at traffic, with no link through to leads or revenue.

Charle has a high average across a modest number of reviews. They are all around a year old, cover Shopify build work and contain no mention of search.

Charle covers five distinct GEO subjects. The strongest piece is a methodological guide bylined by the chief executive. The site publishes no original dataset.

Not rated. Charle joined our tracked prompt set too recently to produce a reading, so this criterion leaves its average unchanged. The same applies on every list. We measure an agency's own AI visibility once, and the result has no Shopify-specific element.

Charle says it has a Shopify and GEO team, with one person named. Neither the site nor LinkedIn gives anyone a GEO title. Shopify Plus Partner status supports the agency's Shopify credentials. We found no company record, so the founding date comes from Charle's own statement.

Charle publishes membership tiers and figures covering Shopify support. The GEO page gives no price, and no minimum term is published.

Charle publishes Shopify client work with AI-search figures attached. Cambridge Satchel and Rhute both have AI-search figures, and both are Shopify stores. Charle is an accredited Shopify agency whose published client base is entirely Shopify.

Clickslice publishes four dedicated answer-engine case studies. Each names the client and shows where visibility and citation share started and finished. The fourth concerns Clickslice's own brand, which the agency discloses. None gives a measurement period.

Clickslice names its measurement instrument, builds prompt sets for individual clients and provides live dashboards. Reporting reaches leads, sales and revenue.

Clickslice has the highest review count in the study, with a strong recent average. The readable reviews cover search work. Two describe the sales process before the work began.

Clickslice covers a broad range of AI-search subjects and publishes two calculators. Its strongest material takes a clear position on measuring visibility. Much of the AI content consists of agency rankings, and the site publishes no original dataset analysis.

Clickslice appears in the tracked AI answers more often than most agencies, placing it in the upper part of the field.

A LinkedIn role names AI search directly. An agency-of-the-year win and vendor partner accreditation add external evidence to the agency's record.

Clickslice publishes a starting monthly figure and an itemised link-building rate card. Its AI-search pages give no specific price, and no minimum term is published.

We reviewed all 28 Clickslice case studies and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result. The platform is never stated in the published client work.

SEO Works publishes five pieces of client work that name AI visibility, the most in the study. The strongest names the client and period, then tracks the result through to revenue. None gives a starting point or names the measurement instrument.

SEO Works explains what it tracks on its service pages and reports monthly. The work is tied to client targets. Case studies connect AI visibility with conversions and revenue, although they do not name the tools used.

SEO Works has a solid average across a large number of reviews. Two readable reviews specifically mention search work and are recent. A noticeable group of one-star reviews also appears in the wider review set.

SEO Works publishes a substantial library of datasets, including research with clear sourcing and stated sample limitations. Some of the strongest work focuses on SEO and brand rather than generative search.

SEO Works appears in the tracked AI answers more often than almost any other agency, ranking second on this measure.

SEO Works has an established team and external evidence of its reputation. Its published material gives less detail about dedicated AI-search roles.

SEO Works publishes four pricing tiers with figures and explains who each tier suits. Five pieces of client work involving AI search provide further evidence of the service.

We reviewed every SEO Works case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

Ten case studies mention AI visibility, and three include a figure. The strongest names the client, gives the period and tracks AI Overview presence and ChatGPT traffic through to conversions. None names the source of the figures.

Exposure Ninja's audit explains what it assesses across five named platforms, and clients receive the full prompt library. The agency names no measurement instrument and gives no reporting rhythm for its AI work.

Exposure Ninja has a very large number of recent reviews and a strong average. Readable reviews cover search and website work, although none specifically mentions AI search.

One report provides original analysis with a stated method, counting which brands AI answers cite within a sector. The sample size is missing. Two further reports sit behind download forms.

Exposure Ninja appears only occasionally in the tracked AI answers, placing it in the lower half of the field.

Two formal job titles carry AI-search responsibilities. The chief executive speaks at major industry conferences. An agency-of-the-year title and a long list of award shortlists add further external evidence.

Exposure Ninja publishes no price for its own services. An outside register carries a rate. The agency has also argued publicly that businesses should publish pricing.

We reviewed every Exposure Ninja case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

One AI-search case study provides unusually detailed evidence. It names the client, covers a 12-month period, explains the tactics and links the figures to the tools behind them. It does not give the starting position.

Impression names three measurements, tracks prompts by topic and business, and follows reporting through to conversion and revenue. It describes the tracking software without naming it, and gives no reporting rhythm.

Impression has a strong average across a good number of reviews. One mentions search work, while the rest are more general. The newest readable review is around a year old.

Impression covers eight distinct AI-search subjects. Its strongest pieces take a position on issues such as which AI metrics matter to boards. The team refers to tests without publishing the underlying results as research.

Impression appears in the tracked AI answers more often than almost all other agencies, placing it near the top of the field.

Impression has a large team and strong external reputation, including B Corp certification and several agency-of-the-year wins. No published team role specifically carries AI search.

Impression publishes no clear price for its AI service.

We reviewed every Impression case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

Polaris Agency publishes one AI-search case study, and it is among the best evidenced in this section. The client is named and quoted, the starting position appears in figures, the period is stated and the change is substantial. The case study does not identify the measurement instrument.

Polaris publishes a full GEO service tree. Its tracking page names what it measures, and reporting reaches referral attribution and conversion. The agency builds the measurement stack around each client and names no platform. It gives no reporting rhythm.

Polaris has a decent average across a modest number of reviews. One names search work, one covers email marketing and one offers general praise. The newest review is a year old.

Polaris covers more than six distinct AI-search subjects, and its playbooks take positions of their own. Where figures appear, the agency cites other sources. It publishes no original dataset analysis about generative search.

Polaris appears in our tracked AI answers a fair amount, placing it in the upper half of the field.

Polaris has a small team and no AI-search job title. Its search director on LinkedIn is the same person quoted in the AI case study, which supports both claims. A strong, recent run of search award wins adds external evidence.

Polaris has a dedicated pricing page with three tiers, figures and the team assigned to each level. That detail is unusual and useful. The tiers cover search, content and digital PR, while the GEO pages give no separate figure.

We reviewed every Polaris Agency case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

Reboot publishes AI-search work with measurable results and explains the approach used. The evidence is stronger on methodology than on the source of the underlying measurements.

Reboot explains its GEO tracking and monitoring approach. It also publishes dedicated material about measuring AI visibility and conducting audits.

Reboot has the lowest review score in the study, based on a relatively small number of reviews. Around a third receive one star. Two readable reviews mention search work.

Reboot publishes a controlled GEO experiment that states its hypothesis and method, gives the full results and records where the experiment failed. The team planted a fact that appeared nowhere else, then tested whether AI models would repeat it.

Reboot appears occasionally in the tracked AI answers, slightly below the middle of the field.

Reboot publishes a dedicated AI-search job title, clearly identifies its leadership and has more than a decade of history. Agency recognition and conference speaking provide further external evidence.

Reboot publishes one figure for the service that performs the AI work and explains the entry point. It publishes no tiers, minimum term or notice period.

We reviewed every Reboot case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

Passion Digital publishes one AI-search case study with before-and-after visibility-share figures and a five-step method. The client is unnamed, and the source of the figures is not given.

Passion Digital gives its AI-search service several dedicated pages. It names the measures tracked across four engines, names two instruments including one of its own, builds prompts for each client and reports through to traffic and leads. It gives no sampling frequency.

Passion Digital has a strong average across a good number of reviews, all around a year old. One names search work. The rest are general, and one comes from a partner agency.

Passion Digital covers seven distinct AI-search subjects. Its strongest piece explains how to identify AI crawlers that ordinary analytics miss. The material relies on other people's figures and includes no analysis of an original dataset.

Not rated. Passion Digital joined our tracked prompt set too recently to produce a reading, so this criterion leaves its average unchanged. The same applies on every list. We measure an agency's own AI visibility once, and the result has no Shopify-specific element.

Passion Digital's team page and LinkedIn profile agree, and neither includes a role aligned to AI search. Award recognition and recent finalist places support the firm's reputation. The company record is clean.

Passion Digital publishes no price for any service. Its enquiry form includes a budget selector, but that only shows the bands the agency works within. It does not explain what each band buys.

We reviewed every Passion Digital case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.

One case study names AI visibility. Its figure measures the share of citations attributed to content, so it shows attribution rather than a change in visibility. The case study gives no starting point, period or measurement instrument. Found reuses the same figure as proof across several service pages.

Found publishes a full service tree covering individual answer engines. It names the measures tracked across five platforms, uses its own named product, tracks continuously and builds prompts for each client. Reporting stops at visibility and sentiment.

Found has a strong average across a small number of reviews. One names search work, while the rest cover web projects and general praise. The newest review is two years old.

Found covers ten or more distinct AI-search subjects, and its strongest pieces take positions of their own. It publishes no original dataset analysis.

Found appears in our tracked AI answers more often than any other agency in the study.

Found publishes a large team, which LinkedIn corroborates. Neither source names an AI-search role. A director's headline uses AI wording, while award shortlists and wins provide further external evidence.

Found publishes three price bands with figures and explains what moves the price. It does not itemise what each band includes, and its AI-search pages give no separate figure.

We reviewed every Found case study and found no Shopify client with an attached AI-search result.